A lawsuit filed against Subway -- that accuses the franchise of using non-tuna in its tuna subs -- has been amended after lab tests found chicken, pig and cattle DNA in the mystery meat!
This change marks the third time plaintiffs Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin have amended the lawsuit.
Photo: Getty Images
The latest addition claims the duo collected 20 tuna samples from 20 different Subway restaurants in Southern California. They were then submitted to a lab for testing... And according to the lab, 19 of the 20 samples contained "no detectable tuna DNA sequences whatsoever" -- but researchers did find pork, chicken and beef in 11 of the samples, per the amended suit.
Despite the findings, Subway officials continue to claim their tuna is the real thing!!!
"Subway tuna is high-quality, wild-caught, 100 percent tuna," a spokesman says. "The plaintiffs have filed three meritless complaints, changing their story each time. This third, most recent amended claim, was filed only after their prior complaint was rightfully dismissed by a federal judge."
Read the full report on The Mercury News.