LAPD Captain Says Complaints About Misuse of Personnel Brought Retaliation

Justice Scales and wooden gavel. Justice concept

Photo: Getty Images

LOS ANGELES (CNS) - A veteran Los Angeles police captain assigned to help oversee the policing of Metro subway lines and buses is suing the city, alleging he was reprimanded for a trivial matter in retaliation for complaining that the commander of his unit was using some personnel for work unrelated to transportation duties.

Capt. Brian Pratt's Los Angeles Superior Court whistleblower suit was filed Friday and seeks unspecified damages.

“We will review the complaint and we have no further comment at this time,'' Rob Wilcox, a representative for the City Attorney's Office, said Tuesday.

Pratt was hired in 1988 and was promoted to captain in June 2011, then upgraded to captain III in June 2013, the suit states.

The city of Los Angeles was awarded a five-year, $370 million contract with Metro in February 2017 to provide LAPD officers to patrol Metro subway lines and buses within the city. The LAPD established a Transit Services Bureau and a Transit Services Division within the bureau.

Pratt began serving as the Captain III of the Transit Services Division in March of 2017, the suit states. In early 2019, Deputy Chief Blake Chow became the TSB commanding officer, the suit states. Chow and Commander Michael Oreb, the TSB assistant commanding officer, took multiple transit employees being paid by MTA to perform work for the agency and used them for jobs that “did not relate to MTA at all,'' according to the suit.

Pratt allegedly began complaining about the alleged misuse of the employees one or two times a month beginning in February 2019.

In July 2020, Pratt found out for the first time that Oreb had initiated a masked personnel complaint against him for a “trivial matter'' in December 2019, the suit states. Pratt believes the complaint, the subject of which is not detailed in the suit, prevented him from being promoted to commander.

In addition, Pratt learned in October 2020 that the LAPD placed his name on the Officer and Recurrent Witness Information Tracking System list in June 2020 before he was interviewed concerning Oreb's personnel complaint against him, the suit states. ORWITS contains the names of peace officers who have been accused of making false statements and is accessible by government agencies, according to the suit.

Having his name in ORWITS will adversely impact Pratt's ability to obtain employment opportunities outside the LAPD, the suit states.

Last November, Chow sustained the allegation against Pratt and the next month the LAPD officially reprimanded him based on the complaint that was placed in his personnel file and will harm his ability to obtain post-retirement employment, according to the suit.

Copyright 2021, City News Service, Inc.

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content