Supreme Court Sides with South Bay Catholic Schools Sued by Former Teachers

Photo: Getty Images

LOS ANGELES (CNS) - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that fifth-grade teachers at two religious elementary schools in the South Bay were "ministers'' who were not entitled to assert discrimination claims against their employers.

The cases, Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, considered how broadly the ``ministerial exception'' -- which prohibits courts from deciding certain employment disputes brought by ministers -- applies to teachers at religious schools.

The 7-2 ruling strengthened the exception the nation's high court found in 2012 that protects religious organizations from certain employment lawsuits. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, saying the decision gave religious employers ``free rein to discriminate.''

In the first case, Agnes Morrissey-Berru sued Our Lady of Guadalupe school in Hermosa Beach for age discrimination after her teaching contract wasn't renewed when she was in her 60s.

The second plaintiff, Kristen Biel, sued St. James School in Torrance when -- after disclosing that she was being treated for breast cancer -- the school failed to renew her contract. Biel claimed that the school had discriminated against her because of her illness, but the district court agreed with the school that Biel's lawsuit was barred by the ministerial exception.

Biel died last year at age 54 after a five-year battle with the disease.

Both suits were both initially dismissed by Los Angeles federal judges, but an appeals court revived them.

Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito stated that the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, where both of the fired South Bay teachers worked, considers its teachers to be "responsible for the faith formation of the students in their charge each day,'' and thus deserving of the ``ministerial exception.''

The American Civil Liberties Union filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court to recognize both the rights of religious institutions and the nondiscrimination interests that employees of religious schools have.

"The Supreme Court had an opportunity to adopt a robust and nuanced test to govern these disputes, one that would have preserved religious institutions' ability to choose their ministers while also protecting the vast majority of employees from invidious discrimination,'' said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. "Instead, the court appears to defer largely to the say-so of schools, essentially offering them a rubber stamp for discrimination.''

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content